Drinking-water page diagnostic

Does the page match an RO system to the customer's water concern and kitchen?

A strong reverse osmosis page starts with the water provider, concern, point of use, available space, plumbing and drain conditions, household demand, and maintenance commitment. It should never imply that Phoenix or Scottsdale tap water is unsafe merely because it is hard or tastes different.

Run the checklistGet a Fix List

Separate four jobs buyers often bundle together

“Water filter” can mean a pitcher, under-sink cartridge, point-of-use RO system, or treatment for the whole property. Help the buyer select the right evaluation without turning an aesthetic concern into a health claim.

Point-of-use RO

Explain which sink or appliance outlets receive treated water, the storage-tank or tankless layout, expected recovery and flow in qualified terms, and what space, power, pressure, drain, and faucet conditions must be checked.

Whole-house hardness treatment

Keep scale and whole-home calcium and magnesium treatment on the water softener framework. An under-sink RO unit and a softener solve different problems and may be used separately or together.

Specific contaminant concern

Start with the current utility water-quality report or an appropriate accredited test. Match any reduction claim to the exact product's current certification and rated conditions; do not claim that “RO removes everything.”

Private well or unusual source

Route private-well, microbial, changing-source, pressure, or pretreatment questions to a source-specific assessment. A standard municipal-water package should not be sold from one TDS reading alone.

A six-step reverse osmosis page audit

Define the customer's concern. Distinguish taste or odor, mineral scale, a named substance, appliance use, sodium from softened water, and general preference. Do not turn every answer into a contamination claim.
Verify every product statement. Record the exact model, configuration, certification listing, substances covered, capacity, rated conditions, recovery or efficiency basis, replacement intervals, and current documentation.
Explain the site survey. Show how the installer checks feed plumbing, shutoff condition, pressure, cabinet space, drain connection, faucet or air-gap requirements, electrical supply, appliance routing, and leak protection.
Publish the full installed scope. State what the equipment, faucet, tubing, valves, drain connection, drilling, appliance connection, startup, flushing, water check, cleanup, and old-equipment removal include or exclude.
Make ownership visible. Give a filter, membrane, sanitizing, tank, monitoring, and service plan based on the model and water conditions. Avoid fixed lifespan claims that ignore usage, feed quality, and maintenance.
Test the conversion path. Submit one taste-focused municipal-water request and one named-contaminant question on mobile. Confirm staff receive the source, concern, site constraints, and model interest without making a diagnosis.

Use a fit framework before recommending equipment

A good page explains why a configuration fits. It does not rank systems by stage count or marketing labels alone.

Water and treatment goal

Use the customer's current provider report and any appropriate test to define the goal. Distinguish regulated health standards from secondary or aesthetic parameters, and explain what the selected product is documented to reduce.

Production and delivery

Discuss household demand, storage, refill time, faucet flow, simultaneous appliance use, incoming pressure, and temperature. Published output is not a promise of identical performance in every kitchen.

Installation fit

Check cabinet space, drain method, faucet mounting, counter or sink material, electrical needs, existing softener, refrigerator distance, shutoffs, and leak detection. Explain when another trade or customer approval is needed.

Lifetime work and waste

Show replacement parts, service access, sanitation, monitoring, rejected-water handling, and decommissioning. Compare models with disclosed test conditions rather than calling one “zero waste” or maintenance-free without support.

Reverse osmosis installation page checklist

  • Unique title, H1, description, and self-referencing canonical
  • The page has a distinct point-of-use RO purpose
  • RO, filtration, softening, conditioning, and disinfection are distinguished
  • Municipal water and private-well routes are separated
  • Taste, odor, scale, and health concerns are not conflated
  • Hardness is not described as proof that municipal water is unsafe
  • Current local water-quality reports are linked
  • A single TDS reading is not treated as a safety test
  • Testing recommendations match the actual concern
  • No “removes all contaminants” claim appears
  • Reduction claims identify the exact product and current evidence
  • Certification language names the standard and scope accurately
  • Stage count is not a substitute for performance evidence
  • System type, model, capacity, and configuration are clear
  • Rated production and faucet flow are distinguished
  • Pressure, temperature, and source-water conditions are disclosed
  • Tank and tankless tradeoffs are explained without absolutes
  • Recovery, efficiency, and rejected-water claims state their basis
  • “Zero waste” language is verified or removed
  • Under-sink space and service clearance are assessed
  • Feed valve, shutoff, drain, and air-gap scope are addressed
  • Faucet drilling and counter or sink material are addressed
  • Electrical needs for pumps or monitoring are disclosed
  • Refrigerator and ice-maker routing is scoped separately
  • Existing softener or pretreatment is considered
  • Leak protection and post-installation checks are explained
  • Equipment, labor, parts, drilling, and haul-away are itemized or bounded
  • Permitting and code claims are jurisdiction-specific and current
  • Filter and membrane intervals are model- and condition-specific
  • Sanitizing, tank checks, monitoring, and service ownership are visible
  • Replacement-part availability and ongoing cost are not hidden
  • No fixed filter life or water-savings guarantee is made
  • Warranty coverage and exclusions match current written terms
  • Forms capture provider or well, concern, household use, space, and appliance feeds
  • Forms do not request utility credentials or unnecessary health information
  • Phone, form, and confirmation work on mobile
  • Reviews and photos are authentic, permissioned, and relevant
  • Structured data matches visible provider, service area, offer, and price
  • No fabricated rating, certification, removal claim, location, or availability appears in schema
  • Water softener, leak detection, estimate form, and plumbing audit guides are linked
  • A named owner rechecks product documents, local reports, forms, and terms
  • Copy avoids guaranteed purity, health outcomes, savings, rankings, calls, leads, or revenue

Operator references: The City of Phoenix's current water-quality report describes local hardness and warns that home treatment systems must be operated and maintained according to manufacturer instructions. Scottsdale's drinking-water guidance explains that hardness is an aesthetic concern rather than a primary health standard. Use the customer's provider and latest report.

Limitation: A website audit cannot test water, diagnose a health concern, select treatment, validate a product certification, design plumbing or drainage, establish code compliance, predict site output, or guarantee purity. The water provider, qualified laboratory, product documentation, installer, authority, and customer control those decisions. No health, purity, savings, rankings, calls, leads, or revenue are promised.

Want the RO-page gaps ranked?

The $49 Mini Fix List prioritizes fit, claims, scope, maintenance, trust, and contact problems. The $99 Full Local Fix List adds mobile flow, local SEO hygiene, speed, screenshots, and competitor context. Implementation is optional after diagnosis.

Request a Fix List